San Antonio Area
Roads & More
US 281 North
"Super-Street" |
|
|
This page last updated
August 19, 2010 |
In February 2009, with the
proposed US 281 tollway stalled due to ongoing litigation that resulted
in a new environmental study being required, engineers with Pape-Dawson
Engineering made public an unsolicited proposal to convert US 281 into a
"super-street" from Encino Rio to Marshall. Under the plan,
the
intersections of Encino Rio, Evans, Stone Oak, and Marshall are being
reconstructed to eliminate some straight-through and left-turn movements
and instead use downstream turnarounds on 281 to either turn back the
other way on 281 or get back to the intersecting road and then turn
right to continue through on it. While the plan does add
additional signals and forces some drivers to travel out of
their way, the plan is expected to reduce overall congestion in the area because it will reduce signal
cycles at each intersection from five or six phases to just two, thus allowing
up to 50% additional
green time for 281 traffic. It is estimated that by doing so,
traffic throughput on 281 could increase by at least 30%, average rush
hour speeds could increase by about 10 mph in both directions, and
travel time could be reduced by about eight minutes between Loop 1604
and Marshall Rd. Additionally, the project improves safety by
reducing conflict points (the point where vehicle paths cross) from 32 to 14.
This proposal is considered a
short-term "band-aid" until the environmental studies and
associated legal wrangling for a more significant upgrade of 281 are
resolved over the next several years. The project will cost $5.2
to build, nearly 20% below the final estimates and nearly 50% below
initial projections.
This will be the first
super-street in Texas. The second will be built on
Loop 1604 West.
 |
Please note that the
intersection diagrams below are generalized for the types of intersections
involved and not intended to reflect specific existing or future
conditions on 281. They are intended instead to illustrate the
concepts being discussed. For schematics of the actual proposed
super-street improvements for 281, see the "Project
schematics" section. Thanks to "SPUI" for the base
super-street illustration used in the intersection diagrams. |
On this page:
Current configuration
The number of lanes and other
minor differences aside, this is how the intersections on 281 look today
(except for Encino Rio, which is a "T" intersection):

The split-phase signal configuration
necessitated by traffic patterns at these intersections requires five signal
phases per cycle to allow for each movement through the intersection (not
counting the brief all-way red clearance intervals):
1

2

3

4

5

The number of phases and
required length of each phase (due to heavy traffic volumes on all the
approaches) causes signal cycles to be long, thus causing long queues
and congestion, especially during peak periods. Additionally, each
signal phase adds up to 15 seconds of "lost" time due to yellow and
all-way red clearance intervals as well as the time it takes for stopped
motorists to react to a green and to start moving.
"Super-street" plan
The super-street proposal
would reconfigure the intersections at Evans, Stone Oak, and Marshall like this:

At first glance, I know it looks pretty scary,
but it's actually not very complicated once you understand how it works and why. The proposed changes eliminate the
ability of traffic on the cross-street to continue straight through the
intersection or to turn left. Instead, all traffic on the
cross-street must turn right onto 281, then use a downstream turnaround on 281
to either go the opposite direction or to return to the cross-street.
Those turnarounds would be located approximately 1000 feet (about 2/10th
of a mile) from the intersection they serve to allow sufficient room for
merging and storage. Essentially, this creates an elongated
signalized roundabout with two left-turn cut-throughs. Roundabouts
are generally more efficient at moving traffic than conventional
signalized intersections.
Traffic flow through the intersections
So how does traffic flow
through the super-street intersections?
Straight-through traffic on
US 281 and traffic turning right from 281 to the cross-street will see no change:

Traffic turning left from 281
to the cross-street also will see virtually no change:

And traffic turning right onto
281 from the cross-street will also see no change:

However, traffic wanting to turn
left from the cross-street onto 281 will instead turn right, then use
the turnaround downstream on 281 to turn-back the other direction on 281
(for simplicity, this diagram just shows the maneuver for one direction):

Similarly, traffic wanting to
continue straight on the cross-street across 281 will have to instead
turn right, use the turnaround downstream on 281, then turn right to get
back onto the cross-street (again, this diagram just shows the maneuver
for one direction):

Encino Rio intersection
Note that the Encino Rio intersection will be different than those
described above. Traffic coming from Encino Rio will be allowed to
turn left onto 281 southbound. In fact, an additional left turn
lane will be added (for a total of three). To still allow for
operational improvement, traffic from southbound 281 will not be allowed
to turn left onto Encino Rio. Those wishing to do so will instead
continue south of 281 for about 1000 ft. and then turn around and head
north, where they will turn right onto Encino Rio.
Traffic signals
The proposal does not eliminate
the signalized intersections; in fact, it doubles the number of signals in
each direction on 281. I know it's counterintuitive that adding
signals will help improve traffic flow; however, by eliminating the straight-through and left turn movements on the cross-street,
engineers can make some dramatic changes to the signal phasing. Specifically, the number of signal
phases can be reduced from today's five phases to just two:
1

2

Notice how many movements are
accomplished in the second phase. This essentially takes phases 4 and 5
and the left turn movements of phases 1 and 3 of the conventional intersection and combines them
all into one, eliminating all the time required for those individual
phases. In addition, significant additional time savings will be realized
because every signal phase inherently includes some "wasted" time in the
form of yellow and all-way red clearance intervals, as well as the time
it takes for drivers to start moving when they get a green light.
All of that can add up to 15 seconds of lost time per phase. These
time savings will allow the green time for 281 through traffic to be increased without having to correspondingly reduce the green time
for the cross-street or lengthen the total cycle time.
If that's still unclear,
here's another way of looking at it. Imagine in the diagrams above that
you're on the main road headed from left to right. In the "current
configuration", you reach the intersection just as the light turns red (phase
3). You then have to wait through phase 3 for 30 seconds, phase 4 for 60
seconds, and phase 5 also for 60 seconds before you get a green light again on
phase 1. This means you've waited 2½
minutes. With the super-street, all of the movements that took
2½
minutes before can now be accomplished in a single 60 second phase. That
means through traffic on 281 only has to stop for 60 seconds; the balance of the
2½
minutes required for the conventional intersection (90 seconds) can then be
added to the green time for US 281 through traffic. So if that traffic
today gets 1½
minutes of green time, it would get 3 minutes with the super-street, an obvious
and substantial improvement. (Note that the numbers I provide here
are for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the actual
current or proposed phase and cycle times for 281.)
|
EXAMPLE GREEN TIMES |
|
Movement |
Conventional
intersection |
Super-street
intersection |
|
Cross-street westbound |
60 seconds |
N/A* |
|
Cross-street eastbound |
60 seconds |
N/A* |
|
US 281 left turns |
30 seconds |
N/A* |
|
Super-street all-turns phase |
N/A |
60 seconds |
|
US 281 through |
90 seconds |
180 seconds |
|
TOTAL CYCLE TIME |
240 seconds |
240 seconds |
* These phases are
combined into the "all turns" phase under the super-street plan
In addition to reducing
signal phases, super-streets allow for much better synchronization of the
signals. With conventional intersections, signals for all directions are
inherently interdependent-- in other words, changes can not be made to one
direction without adversely affecting the others. These dependencies make
synchronization-- or "progression"-- tricky, especially two-way progression.
But with a super-street, the signals for traffic going in each direction on the
major roadway (US 281 in this case) are completely independent of each other.
In effect, both sides of US 281 will function like an independent one-way
street. This provides the ability to synchronize the signals much more
easily and reliably without regards to the number of signals or their spacing,
and the signals can react better to various traffic conditions.
Essentially, it provides the perfect environment for synchronization.
Project schematics

Click on one of the
links below to see an annotated engineering schematic for each
intersection. These schematics are courtesy of ARMA and are
subject to change. Annotations are my own.
Full schematics
can been downloaded from ARMA's website (see
link below.)
Super-street concerns
- Ability to safely
cross over to turnarounds:
Some members of the public have questioned how traffic from the
cross-streets can safely merge onto 281, then move across the traffic lanes to
the turnaround, then merge back onto 281 headed the other direction.
The answer is that there will be signals that stop the 281 through traffic
to allow that cross-street traffic out onto 281 at both the main
intersection and also at the turnarounds. As discussed above, even though the
signals at the intersections remain and extra signals are added at the
turnarounds, the number of signal phases is reduced substantially, thus
allowing significantly more green time for 281 through traffic, and signal
synchronization is much easier.
- Too confusing for
drivers: Another concern expressed by the
public that these changes might be too confusing to many drivers.
This being the first super-street in Texas, it will naturally take
drivers a little time to get used to. However, because all traffic on the intersecting street is forced to
turn right, any confusion should be quickly overcome instinctively once
the driver has turned. Additionally, because all traffic is
flowing in the same direction and protected by signals, and because
there are fewer conflict points, the likelihood of collisions is
substantially reduced, even during the adjustment period.
- Requires traveling
out of the way: Some folks are bothered that to
turn left or go straight on the cross-street would require going out of
one's way to accomplish. This is true, but the amount of through
traffic on Evans, Stone Oak, and Marshall is fairly trivial, especially
compared with traffic that turns onto 281. The biggest
constituency that would be inconvenienced under this plan would be
motorists coming from east of 281 wanting to turn south onto 281.
However, because overall congestion in the area should be reduced, they
should still see benefits from this plan. Also keep in mind that a
plan similar to this is already in place in that area-- traffic coming
from Red Land Rd. wanting to turn south onto 281 must travel north to
the turnaround near Encino Rio first. This has prevented an
additional signal from needing to be installed at Red Land. Also,
a similar plan was implemented during the construction of the 281
freeway from Bitters to Loop 1604 back in the late '80s. As a
result of that, traffic actually moved better during construction than
it did before.
- Pedestrian
crossings: Finally, some people have
wondered how pedestrians would be able to cross these intersections.
Here is a diagram of the typical pedestrian crosswalks and pathways in a
super-street intersection:

Project status
The MPO approved funding for this project on March 23rd, 2009. Funding
is coming from a combination of
funds from the federal stimulus, Advanced Transportation District, and City of San Antonio.
On January 14th, ARMA's board selected Ballenger Construction's bid of
$5.2 million to build the project. Ground was broken on the
project on March 11th and should be completed by late September. Nearly all work
is being done at night to minimize disruptions to traffic. As of
early July, the work was about 40% complete, with some delays due to
unusually wet weather this Spring.
Other sites of interest
|