San
Antonio Area Roads & More
Superstreets |
|
| This
page last updated
February 17, 2012 |
| |
|
 |
A
"superstreet" is a roadway where the signalized intersections have been
modified to eliminate left turns and straight-through traffic on the
cross street. Doing this reduces the number of traffic signal
phases required to move traffic through the intersection thereby
allowing for longer green times on the major roadway and thus reducing
congestion caused by the signals.
The San
Antonio area currently has two sections of superstreets: one on US 281
North (four intersections) and one on Loop 1604 West (two
intersections). In both cases, the superstreet provides a
transition between the freeway and non-freeway sections of those roads
and both are considered to be "short-term" improvements while planning
is completed and funding acquired for more substantial upgrades.
A superstreet has also been proposed along Bandera Rd. between Eckhert
and Loop 1604.
|
These were the
first two superstreets in Texas. A third is planned in Austin.
 |
Please
note that the intersection diagrams below are generalized for the types
of intersections involved and not intended to reflect specific existing
or future conditions on either 281 or 1604. They are intended
instead to illustrate the concepts being discussed. Thanks to
"SPUI" for the base superstreet illustration used in the intersection
diagrams. |
On this page:
Local superstreet history
US 281
In February 2009, with the proposed US 281 tollway stalled due to
ongoing litigation that resulted in a new environmental study being
required, engineers with Pape-Dawson Engineering made public an
unsolicited proposal to the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (ARMA) to
convert US 281 into a "superstreet" from Encino Rio to Marshall.
The plan was expected to increase traffic throughput on 281 by at least
30%, increase average rush hour speeds by about 10 mph in both
directions, and reduce travel time by about eight minutes between Loop
1604 and Marshall Rd. The MPO approved funding for this project
on March 23rd, 2009. Funding came from a combination of funds
from the federal stimulus, Advanced Transportation District, and City
of San Antonio. On January 14th, 2010, ARMA's board selected
Ballenger Construction's bid of $5.2 million to build the project,
which was nearly 20% below the final estimates and nearly 50% below
initial projections. Ground was broken on the project on March
11th. The first intersection (Encino Rio) was completed on August
29th. Weather delayed work on the Marshall Rd. intersection; it
was finally completed on September 26th. The remaining
intersections were completed on the weekends of October 2nd and 9th.
Loop 1604
In October 2009, with plans for the US 281 superstreet nearing
completion, the Bexar County Commissioners Court approved funding to
study a possible superstreet in the Loop 1604 West corridor,
specifically between Braun Rd. and SH 151, as a possible interim
solution to ease congestion while ARMA completes an environmental study
on possible long-term improvements. The superstreet study,
completed in early 2010, showed that a combination of improvements
along that section of 1604 would provide substantial
improvements. In May, ARMA previewed the initial designs and
expected benefits. Under the plan, the intersections of New
Guilbeau and Shaenfield would be reconstructed as superstreet
intersections. It is estimated that by doing so, travel speeds
could be increased by 36% and delays reduced by 69% during the morning
peak and that average travel speeds could be increased by 65% and
delays reduced by 79% during the evening peak period. The
superstreet improvements at New Guilbeau and at Shaenfield began
construction in March 2011. The New Guilbeau intersection was
completed August 18th, followed on September 15th by the Shaenfield
intersection.
Bandera Road
TxDOT has proposed a superstreet along Bandera Rd. between Eckhert and
Loop 1604. However, funding is currently unavailable. To
date, Leon Valley has not endorsed extending that south to Loop 410.
Conventional
intersection operation
Before I explain
how a superstreet works, it's important to understand how the
conventional intersections on 281 and on 1604 functioned, especially
the traffic signal operation. Understanding the traffic
signal phasing is vital to realizing the improvements provided by a
superstreet.
The number of
lanes and other minor differences aside, this is how the intersections
on 281 and on 1604 were configured prior to the superstreet (make the
obvious adjustment for the "T" intersections at Encino Rio, New
Guilbeau, and Shaenfield):

The split-phase
signal configuration necessitated by traffic patterns at these
intersections required five signal phases per cycle (three for the "T"
intersections) to allow for each movement through the intersection:
Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3

Phase 4

Phase 5

The number of phases
and required length of each phase (due to heavy traffic volumes on all
the approaches) caused signal cycles to be long, thus causing long
queues and congestion, especially during peak periods.
Additionally, each signal phase adds up to 15 seconds of "lost" time
due to yellow and all-way red clearance intervals as well as the time
it takes for stopped motorists to react to a green and to start moving.
How
a superstreet works
The superstreet
proposal reconfigured the intersections like this:

At first glance,
I know it looks quite complicated, but it actually makes sense once you
understand how it works and why. The changes eliminate the
ability of traffic on the cross-street to continue straight through the
intersection or to turn left. Instead, all traffic on the
cross-street must turn right onto 281 or 1604, then use a downstream
turnaround to either go the opposite direction or to return to the
cross-street to continue on it. Those turnarounds are located
approximately 1000 feet (about 2/10th of a mile) from the intersection
they serve to allow sufficient room for merging and storage. By
eliminating the through-traffic and left-turns from the cross-streets,
it eliminates the signal phases required for those movements.
That is where the benefit is derived (see below.)
(Note that the
Encino Rio intersection on US 281 is different than described
above. Traffic coming from Encino Rio is allowed to turn left
onto 281 southbound. In fact, an additional left turn lane was
added for a total of three. To still allow for operational
improvement, traffic from southbound 281 is not allowed to turn left
onto Encino Rio and northbound traffic is not allowed to turn left into
the quarry. Those wishing to do so instead continue along 281 for
about 1000 ft. and then turn around, where they can then turn right
onto Encino Rio or the quarry.)
Superstreets
don't eliminate the signalized intersections; in fact, it can double
the number of signals. I know it's counterintuitive that adding
signals can help improve traffic flow. However, by eliminating
the straight-through and left turn movements on the cross-street,
engineers are able to make some dramatic changes to the signal
phasing. Specifically, the number of signal phases is reduced
from the previous five phases to just two (or from three to two
at a "T" intersection):
Phase 1

Phase 2

Notice how many
movements are accomplished in the second phase. This essentially
takes phases 4 and 5 and the left turn movements of phases 1 and 3 of
the conventional intersection and combines them all into one,
eliminating all the additional time required for those individual
phases. Furthermore, significant additional time savings is
realized because every signal phase inherently includes some "wasted"
time in the form of yellow and all-way red clearance intervals, as well
as the time it takes for drivers to start moving when they get a green
light. All of that can add up to 15 seconds of lost time per
phase. These time savings allow the green time for 281 and 1604
through traffic to be increased without having to correspondingly
reduce the green time for the cross-street or lengthen the total cycle
time.
If that's still
unclear, here's another way of looking at it. Imagine in the
diagrams above that you're on 281 or 1604 headed from left to
right. In the conventional intersection, you reach the
intersection just as the light turns red (phase 3). You then have
to wait through phase 3 for 30 seconds, phase 4 for 45 seconds, and
phase 5 also for 45 seconds before you get a green light again on phase
1. This means you've waited for 2 minutes. With the superstreet, all of the movements that took
2 minutes before can now be accomplished in a single 45 second
phase. That means through traffic on 281 or 1604 only has to stop
for 45 seconds; the balance of the 2 minutes required for the conventional
intersection (75 seconds) can then be added to the green time for 281
or 1604. So if that traffic previously got 2 minutes of green time, it can get over 3 minutes with the
superstreet without increasing the overall cycle time. This an
obvious and substantial improvement and is where the benefit of a
superstreet is derived. (Note that the numbers I provide
here are for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect
the actual current or previous phase and cycle times on either 281 or
1604.)
| EXAMPLE GREEN TIMES |
| Movement |
Conventional
intersection |
Superstreet
intersection |
|
Cross-street westbound |
45
seconds |
N/A* |
|
Cross-street eastbound |
45
seconds |
N/A* |
| Major
street left turns |
30
seconds |
N/A* |
|
Superstreet all-turns phase |
N/A |
45
seconds |
|
Major street through |
120 seconds |
195 seconds |
|
TOTAL CYCLE TIME |
240
seconds |
240
seconds |
* These phases
are combined into the "all turns" phase under the superstreet plan
In addition to reducing signal phases, superstreets allow for much
better synchronization of the signals. With conventional
intersections, signals for all directions are inherently
interdependent-- in other words, changes can not be made to one
direction without adversely affecting the others. These
dependencies make synchronization, also known as "progression",
tricky, especially two-way progression. But with a superstreet,
the signals for traffic going in each direction on the major roadway
(US 281 or Loop 1604 in this case) are completely independent of each
other and, in fact, separate signal controllers are used for each side
of a superstreet intersection. In effect, both sides of US 281 or
Loop 1604 can function like an independent one-way street. This
provides the ability to synchronize the signals much more easily and
reliably without regards to the number of signals or their spacing, and
the signals can react better to various traffic conditions.
Essentially, it provides the perfect environment for synchronization.
Traffic flow through the intersections
So how does traffic flow through the superstreet intersections?
Straight-through
traffic on US 281 or Loop 1604 and traffic turning right from 281 or
1604 to the cross-street works just like a conventional intersection:

Traffic turning
left from 281 or 1604 to the cross-street also works just like a
conventional intersection:

And traffic
turning right onto 281 or 1604 from the cross-street works just like a
conventional intersection:

However,
traffic wanting to turn left from the cross-street onto 281 or 1604
instead turns right, then uses the downstream turnaround to head the
other direction (for simplicity, this diagram just shows the maneuver
for one direction):

Similarly,
traffic wanting to continue straight on the cross-street across 281 or
1604 instead has to turn right, use the downstream turnaround, then
turn right to get back onto the cross-street (again, this diagram just
shows the maneuver for one direction):

Superstreet concerns
- Ability to
safely cross over to turnarounds: Some members of the public
questioned how traffic from the cross-streets can safely merge onto 281
or 1604, then move across the traffic lanes to the turnaround, then
merge back into the other direction. The answer is that there are
signals that stop the through traffic on 281 or 1604 to allow that
cross-street traffic out at both the main intersection and also at the
turnarounds. As discussed above, even though the signals at the
main intersections remain and extra signals are added at the
turnarounds, the number of signal phases is reduced substantially, thus
allowing significantly more green time for 281 through traffic, and
signal synchronization is much easier.
- Too
confusing for drivers, more accidents: Another concern expressed by
the public was these changes might be too confusing to many drivers and
would result in more accidents. These being the first
superstreets in Texas, it naturally took drivers a little time to get
used to. However, because all traffic on the intersecting street
is forced to turn right, most confusion is quickly overcome
instinctively once the driver has turned and as the driver follows
other more experienced drivers through the intersections.
Additionally, because all traffic is flowing in the same direction and
is protected by signals, the likelihood of collisions is substantially
reduced, even during the adjustment period. Furthermore,
superstreets inherently improve safety by reducing conflict points (the
point where vehicle paths cross) by roughly 50%. A study for the
North Carolina DOT showed that superstreets reduced traffic collisions
by 46% and decreased accidents with injuries by 63%.
- Requires
traveling out of the way: Some folks are bothered that to turn left
or go straight on the cross-street requires going out of one's way to
accomplish. This is true, but because overall congestion in the
area is reduced, everyone still derives some benefit. Also keep
in mind that there are many other cases around the city where traffic
wanting to make a left turn is prohibited from doing so due to a median
or expressway and must turn right first, then make a downstream U-turn,
so this is not an unprecedented concept.
- Pedestrian
crossings: Finally, some people have wondered how pedestrians are
able to cross these intersections. Here is a diagram of the
typical pedestrian crosswalks and pathways in a superstreet
intersection:

How a superstreet
differs from a "Michigan Left"
Folks who have
lived in Michigan and other parts of the country may be familiar with
an intersection layout known as a "Michigan Left" and some have
proffered that a superstreet is the same thing just with a different
name. However, while a Michigan Left is similar to a superstreet,
there are some significant differences between the two:
- In a Michigan
Left, there are no left turns at all. All left turns from both
the major street and cross-street are made using the turnarounds.
In a superstreet, traffic can make left turns from the major street
onto the cross-street; only left turns from the cross-street are made
using the turnarounds.
- In a Michigan
Left, traffic on the cross-street can go straight through. In a
superstreet, all traffic on the cross-street must turn right onto the
major street. Straight-through traffic on the cross-street then
must use the turnaround to return to the intersection.
Below are
simplified schematics that show the allowed maneuvers in each type of
intersection:
 |
 |
| Superstreet
traffic flow |
Michigan Left
traffic flow |
| |
|
US 281 superstreet results
To objectively
measure whether or not the US 281 superstreet had the intended results,
ARMA did before-and-after measurements of travel times, average speeds,
and traffic volumes. The study found that after the completion of
the superstreet, travel times were notably reduced and average speeds
increased even though overall traffic volumes increased in the
corridor. The table below summarizes the findings. To
ensure an "apples-to-apples" comparison, data was collected for
Tuesday-Thursday periods when school was in session and when there were
no abnormal incidents in the corridor (e.g. accidents, signal
malfunctions, bad weather.)
| Metric |
Before Superstreet |
After Superstreet |
Southbound travel time
(Bulverde to Loop 1604, morning rush hour) |
23.3 minutes |
18.9 minutes |
Southbound average speed
(morning rush hour) |
16 mph |
20 mph |
Northbound travel time
(Loop 1604 to Bulverde, evening rush hour) |
19.2 minutes |
12.7 minutes |
Northbound average speed
(evening rush hour) |
19 mph |
29 mph |
| Traffic count (north of Evans) |
60,100 vehicles/day |
63,552 vehicles/day |
| Traffic count (south of Evans) |
74,000 vehicles/day |
81,526 vehicles/day |
Anecdotal reports
from motorists in the corridor on Facebook, from media reports, and
comments on various websites indicate that most of the time, the
superstreet has provided some relief. Recurring traffic signal
malfunctions for the first couple of months after completion of the
project did cause some ongoing problems, but those mostly seem to have
been resolved.
Other sites of interest
|