Home | About me | Contact | What's new
 

San Antonio
Freeway system
  Freeways
    I-10 East
    I-10 West
    I-35 North
    I-35 South
    I-37
    Kelly Pkwy
    Loop 410 (I-410)
    Loop 1604
    SH 151
    Spur 371
    US 90 West
    US 281 North
    Wurzbach Pkwy
  Construction projects
    I-10/Camp Bullis
    I-35/SP 422
    I-37/SE Military
    Loop 410 expansion
    Loop 410 NE
    281/1604 interchange
  Primer
  History
  2008 traffic statistics
  Etcetera
    Media galleries
    Tollway system
      Loop 1604 tollway
      US 281 tollway
    TransGuide
    10/1604 yield signs
    History of 281/410
Other roads & more
FAQ


Twitter

Blog

San Antonio Area Freeway System
US 281 North Tollway Project

This page last updated May 03, 2010
   
This project is currently undergoing a new environmental review and study.
The proposed configuration discussed and shown below was from the previous proposal and may or may not be recommended at the completion of the current study.  Therefore, the proposal below should only be considered a possible scenario of how US 281 could be upgraded.  This page will be updated soon to discuss the options currently being studied.  See the "Project status" section at the bottom for additional information.

Since 2000, TxDOT has had plans to upgrade US 281 north of Loop 1604 to an expressway.  In 2004, the state updated their plans to include tolling of the new expressway lanes.  Below is complete information about the previously proposed project, including its tumultuous history, proposed design and renderings, and the latest status.


SUPER-STREET Just looking for more information on the plans for the US 281 "super-street"?
See the US 281 "super-street" page.

Project history

Prior to 1987, US 281 north of Bitters existed as a four-lane surface divided highway with traffic signals at major intersections.   In 1990, TxDOT completed work to upgrade 281 to a six-lane expressway from Bitters to Loop 1604.  North of 1604, the road remained as a four-lane surface divided highway with signals at Encino Rio.  Since that time, tremendous development has taken place along the 281 corridor north of Loop 1604 to the SH 46 area north of Bulverde.  Meanwhile, US 281 in that area has remained a four- and six-lane surface divided highway with several more signals added at major intersections over the years due to safety and traffic demands. 

In 2000 and 2001, TxDOT announced plans to upgrade 281 to a six- and eight-lane expressway from Loop 1604 to Stone Oak Parkway and to build a standalone overpass at 281 and Borgfeld, with eventual plans to upgrade 281 to a full expressway in phases all the way to FM 306 at the Comal/Blanco County line.  At that time, the section from 1604 to Stone Oak was projected to be funded and to start construction in 2003.  However, due to a sudden rampant increase in construction costs that began that year, the lowest bid for the project came in significantly higher than the amount allocated to fund it.  With construction costs spiraling upward nationally, the price tag for the for the project continued to increase dramatically and the ability to fund the project with existing tax funds at the time became severely eroded.

In December 2003, while TxDOT was regrouping to find additional funding for the project, the Texas Transportation Commission, at the urging of the governor and using tools previously granted by the Legislature and voters, ordered that "controlled-access mobility projects in any phase of development or construction must be evaluated for tolling.  This includes new location facilities and increased capacity projects such as adding additional main lanes or constructing new main lanes."  The 281 project obviously fit that description and TxDOT, therefore, was compelled to evaluate it for possible tolling.  The evaluation showed that it met the requirements for tolling, so per the Transportation Commission's order, the project was reclassified as a toll facility and the funding that had been budgeted for it was reallocated to other highway projects in the area.

Shortly thereafter, a consortium consisting of local construction giant Zachary and the Spanish infrastructure company Cintra, who were working together on a bid to build and operate one of the Trans Texas Corridor projects, submitted an unsolicited bid to TxDOT to build the 281 tollway project, as well as the Loop 1604 project, in return for a 50-year lease to operate the tollways.  Because the bid had merit, TxDOT was required under state law to fully evaluate the Cintra-Zachary bid and accept any other bids for the projects.  The Cintra-Zachary bid not only paid for construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of both roadways (which freed state funding for other projects), it also paid a large concession fee to the state that could also be used to fund other projects.  Based on those merits, the Cintra-Zachary bid was accepted in early 2005.

Consequently, construction began on the Sonterra to Stone Oak section in December 2005.  Shortly thereafter, workers clearing land for the project accidentally broke a sewer line at Evans and 281 and the project was suspended in January, 2006, when environmentalists and toll opponents filed a lawsuit challenging the project, arguing that it required a full (and costly) environmental impact statement (EIS), instead of the numerous environmental assessments (EA) that had been performed up to that time.  Federal law only requires an EIS to be performed if an EA finds significant impacts, which the EAs for 281 did not.  However, TxDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), who were both named in the suit, jointly agreed in January 2006 to suspend work on the 281 tollway project as well as the planned 281/Borgfeld overpass so that a comprehensive and definitive EA for the entire corridor could be done and a subsequent determination made of whether a full impact statement would need to be performed.  Consequently, the contract with Cintra-Zachary was cancelled.  In early 2007, TxDOT released the new assessment, which showed no significant impacts.  The FHWA approved the new assessment on August 14th, 2007, which authorized TxDOT to build the entire 281 tollway in Bexar County from 1604 to Borgfeld without the need for an EIS.

In the meantime, the Legislature had passed a moratorium on nearly all new privately built and/or operated toll roads and passed legislation requiring that local Regional Mobility Authorities be given the right of first refusal on toll projects in their jurisdiction.  The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (ARMA), which was established by Bexar County in 2003, subsequently opted to take control of both the 281 and 1604 toll projects and began planning to build the 281 tollway from 1604 to Borgfeld as a two-phased project starting in 2008.  The Metropolitan Planning Organization approved toll rates for the project in December 2007. 

In February 2008, toll opponents and environmentalists once again filed a lawsuit challenging the latest 281 environmental assessment.  After initial arguments, the judge ruled that the plaintiffs' case had sufficient standing to move forward with discovery.  During the discovery process, TxDOT announced that they found a document that was omitted from the administrative record for the federal environmental approval and asked for a 60 day stay to allow time to submit the document to the FHWA for review to determine if it could change the overall findings of the study.  In early October 2008, TxDOT then reported that they had uncovered a conflict of interest with the contractor who performed the endangered species study.  Specifically, it was discovered that a staff biologist with TxDOT was married to an employee of the company the state had hired to do the a portion of the study, that the TxDOT employee's supervisor was aware of the situation and allowed it but that controls put in place to mitigate the conflict were not enforced.  As a result, TxDOT asked the FHWA to revoke their environmental approval for the project.  In November 2008, all parties involved (TxDOT, ARMA, and the FHWA) agreed to do a more comprehensive environmental impact statement (EIS) for the corridor and the lawsuit was dismissed as moot.  In April 2009, ARMA hired the consultant to develop the new EIS and it is expected to be completed by 2012.

Meanwhile, in May 2008, ARMA had selected Cibolo Creek Infrastructure Joint Venture to design and build the 281 project.  The consortium was headed by Fluor Enterprises of Irving, Texas, and Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Inc. of Atlanta, and included several San Antonio subcontractors.  (Contrary to public perception, the consortium included no foreign companies.)  Design work was 30% completed when it was stopped due to the aforementioned litigation and subsequent decision to do a full EIS.  ARMA had planned to start construction in late 2008 or early 2009 on the first segment, from Loop 1604 to Marshall Rd., with estimated completion in late 2010.  However, those plan have been scrapped and a new project will be recommended as part of the environmental impact statement process.

While the EIS work is completed, ARMA and TxDOT proposed several short-term fixes that do not require environmental clearance.  These improvements predominately consisted of additional turning lanes and auxiliary lanes.  Then in February 2009, a new proposal was made public that would upgrade 281 to a "super-street" from Encino Rio to Marshall.  Under the plan, the intersections of Encino Rio, Evans, Stone Oak, and Marshall would be redesigned to eliminate straight-through and left-turn movements on those intersecting roadways.  Instead, traffic would turn right and then use a downstream turnaround on 281 to either turn back the other way on 281 or get back to the intersecting road and then turn right to continue through on it.  While the plan does add additional signals and forces some drivers to travel out of their way, the plan would reduce overall congestion in the area because it would reduce signal cycles from five or six phases to just two, thus allowing additional green time for 281 traffic.  This proposal is considered a short-term "band-aid" until the environmental studies for a more significant upgrade of 281 are complete.  For more information on the super-street proposal, click here.

Also in February 2009, Congress approved a national economic "stimulus" plan that would pour additional federal money into road construction projects.  The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) approved allocating San Antonio's share of transportation stimulus funding to be used as matching funds to leverage state funding for the first half of a 281/1604 interchange.  This project would build all four of the ramps connecting to 281 south of 1604, i.e. northbound 281 to both directions of 1604, and both directions of 1604 to southbound 281.  The use of the federal funds will allow the ramps to be toll-free.  It was determined that ramps connecting to 281 north of 1604 could not be built until lingering issues stemming from the lawsuits and associated environmental studies for 281 north of 1604 are resolved.  The Texas Transportation Commission (TTC) approved the funding request on March 5th, 2009, and construction is expected to begin in late 2010.  For more information on the 281/1604 interchange, click here.

Long-range plans are still on the books to upgrade US 281 to a full freeway all the way to FM 306 at the Comal/Blanco County line, possibly also as a tollway depending on the future funding and political climate.  The first phase of that eventual plan would upgrade 281 from a two-lane road to a four-lane divided highway from the Guadalupe River to FM 306, although no funding or timeline has been identified for that project as of yet.

(Sidebar: A common public misconception is that simply synchronizing the signals in the corridor would resolve or at least ease congestion.  However, due to traffic patterns and volumes in that area, synchronization is not the panacea that many people believe it to be.  A future article on this site or my blog will explain why.)


Proposed design

This project is currently undergoing a new environmental review and study.
The proposed configuration discussed and shown below was from the previous proposal and may or may not be recommended at the completion of the current study.  Therefore, the proposal below should only be considered a possible scenario of how US 281 could be upgraded.  This page will be updated soon to discuss the options currently being studied.  See the "Project status" section at the bottom for additional information.

The new tollway will look and function just like a regular toll-free expressway.  In other words, the current expressway inside 1604, consisting of mainlanes with overpasses, access roads on each side, and entrance and exit ramps, will be extended northward.  There will be no toll booths and, other than a few overhead gantries for reading electronic toll tags, will have no other special features that will differentiate it from any other expressway.

How the toll lanes will be added
To build the new tolled lanes, the two existing surface-level, signalized roadways will be shifted outward where they will function as toll-free access roads for the tolled expressway lanes that will then be built down the middle. Additionally, several improvements will be made to the new toll-free lanes including an average of one additional lane in each direction throughout the project, turnarounds and additional turning lanes at intersections, and a toll-free overpass at Redland Rd.  Including the tolled lanes, the project will provide an average of three times the number of lanes as there are today.

It is important to note that the design of this project is virtually identical to the previously proposed toll-free project.  The only difference now is that drivers who opt to use the new expressway lanes will pay a toll. 

Animated graphic showing how toll lanes could be added to the existing US 281.


The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority has a computer simulation on their site here showing how the toll lanes will be added.


Simulation and still shots of proposed improvements

This project is currently undergoing a new environmental review and study.
The proposed configuration shown below was from the previous proposal and may or may not be recommended at the completion of the current study.  Therefore, the proposal below should only be considered a possible scenario of how US 281 could be upgraded.  This page will be updated soon to discuss the options currently being studied.  See the "Project status" section at the bottom for additional information.

Below is computer simulation of the planned upgrade to US 281 from Loop 1604 to Borgfeld showing the proposed configuration of the project.  All animations are courtesy of TxDOT.  Obviously, these are proposed designs are almost certainly subject to change.

Below that you will find a link to a page with annotated still shots from the simulation of key intersections showing the location of the tolled and non-tolled lanes and other important features.

Loop 1604 to Borgfeld



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvvUrHaAlo8

(Simulation courtesy of TxDOT)

 

Click here to see annotated still shots from the simulation



Project status

At present, the project is on hold pending a new full environmental impact statement (EIS).  It is expected that the EIS will not be completed and approved until 2012 at the earliest.  It is an important footnote that until the EIS is completed and approved, no major improvements, tolled or not, can be made to the 281 corridor.  This is because the settlements to the lawsuits filed by toll opponents voided all previous environmental clearances for the corridor.


Other sites of interest

Alamo Regional Mobility Authority
http://www.alamorma.org
The 4-1-1 on 281
http://www.411on281.com
   
Related pages on this site:
 


All donations are much appreciated and are used
to offset the expenses of operating this site.
This page and all its contents are Copyright © 2010 by Brian Purcell

NOTICE
The information provided on this website is provided on an "as-is" basis without warranties of any kind either express or implied.  The author and his agents make no warranties or representations of any kind concerning any information contained in this website.  This website is provided only as general information.  The author expressly disclaims all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based upon the information contained herein or with respect to any errors or omissions in such information.  All opinions expressed are strictly those of the author.  This site is not affiliated in any way with any official agency.